Dear Bishop Malone,

It is with a heavy heart that I write this letter to you.  Be assured that I have put this to prayer over these last several weeks.  I am now writing to you about the diocese’s and your position on Maine Question 1.

Three weeks ago at Mass, I was most disturbed to have the sacred liturgy interrupted by your political infomercial.  I have always believed that it is our sacred liturgy that binds our faith community together.  However, three weeks ago I saw our faith community torn apart by your “homily”.  Many in the assembly left the church during your infomercial, only to return after it was over.  Most were appalled at the half-truths promulgated in your speech; and some, even though they may have agreed with you, were upset because it caused many uncomfortable questions from their children who were attending Mass with their parents as a family - - the true “domestic church”.

I never in my life thought that I would live to see the day when a member of the Catholic episcopacy would actually encourage Catholics to vote for discrimination against a minority.  As a junior in college in the spring of 1965, at the age of 18, I spent a month in Selma, Alabama.  I have always taken the Church’s attitudes about peace and social justice seriously.  I have been a proud and faithful Catholic for my entire life, now over 62 years, and I am appalled at your stance about civil marriage equality.  I am sure that in the past, there were bishops who spoke out for slavery, against civil rights, and against women’s suffrage, but I thought that we, through the guidance of the Holy Spirit, had moved beyond such misguided ideas as “God’s will”.   I have attended Catholic schools throughout most of my life and have completed post graduate work in Catholic theology.  And, as a result, I must vote my conscience on all matters:  peace, social justice and rights for minorities and the oppressed.

As for your claim, as stated in your “homily”, that it is all about “protecting the children”, I find that a little hard to accept.  If children are raised in a loving home with parents who love and care for them, regardless of the parents’ sexuality, they will have all they need to succeed in life and grow up to be loving, caring individuals.  After all, the members of the Catholic episcopacy have very little high moral ground on which to stand about protecting children, given recent events.

I firmly believe that one’s sexuality is not a choice, it is the way we, each one of us, were created; and God, She doesn’t make mistakes.  I, personally, did not wake up one morning in my teens, and choose to be heterosexual, any more than any gay or lesbian person made the choice about their own sexuality.

God is Love, Lover and Beloved.  Since all love is God, what difference does the form of that love make?  I do believe that all love should be celebrated and blessed.

I remain a proud Catholic for marriage equality and encourage my Catholic sisters and brothers to support equal rights for all of us, no matter what their created sexuality.

With peace and love I remain

Sincerely yours,

Pamela Murphy Ewers

Lewiston Sun Journal

A committed marriage is a worthy aspiration

By Pamella Starbird Beliveau

Published: Oct 18, 2009 1:25 am

At every juncture of the conversation and debate about protecting same-sex marriage in Maine, we must remind ourselves that we are talking about heart and soul, flesh and blood human beings. We are dealing with people’s lives: people who are in love.

We are all wired for relationship, and that includes intimate relationship. When any person finds that special someone, we aspire to marriage. It is a noble and honorable way to live out our lives. It breaks my heart to deny any loving couple the opportunity to experience married life.

As a practicing Catholic contemplating the issues presented by both sides of referendum Question 1, it seems to me that agitated people are oddly warning Mainers about speculative outcomes should gay and lesbian people be allowed to choose marriage.

Mainers need to be reminded that being afraid is not a desirable quality. Commentary that springs from fear should be critiqued for credibility. I experience these fear-based arguments as quite hard-hearted.

I urge Maine people to recognize the harshness of the words coming from people afraid of same-sex marriage.

Let’s not treat our gay and lesbian relatives, friends and neighbors as if they are not in the room with us as we debate their lives. No matter how said, those words are a form of rejection. I imagine they penetrate like daggers into the hearts of gay and lesbian people, their families and their friends.

I am particularly perplexed by people insisting they genuinely want gays and lesbians “to be happy,” but then deny married happiness as an option for them. The terms are contradictory. It is as if to say, “You are special, but you are not special enough to live out your life in this deeply loving way”; or, “You are special, but you are far too different to aspire to the honor of marriage.”

It is a paradoxical statement and must be exposed for what it is: Minimizing human beings who desire to love one another deeply within a marriage.

Using questionable interpretations of legal and educational events from other states and generalizing them to Maine in an effort to scare people is quite troubling to me. This fuels the fire of discrimination. When linked with commentary offered by overtly fearful people among us, the result forms the basis for alarming discrimination.

Demeaning and hate-filled vocabulary in letters to the editor have associated gay and lesbian life with “war,” “carnage,” “aberration,” “deviation” and “abomination” (just to name a few from recent letters). Those are undeniably hate-filled words.

We do not need to protect our children from gays and lesbians seeking the honor of marriage to live out their lives. Rather, we must protect our children from people spreading questionable, fearful and outright hurtful rhetoric about gays and lesbians who live, work and love in our state.

Quite frankly, I believe most Maine citizens are not afraid. I believe most Maine citizens can discern who is speaking from love and who is speaking from rejection and fear. More commentary on the facts can be viewed at www.religiouscoalition.org, a Web site offered to us by informed, educated, prayerful, and open-minded Maine clergy and lay leaders who have recognized that same-sex marriage must be spoken to in truthful and loving terms and without useless anxiety.

Love, monogamy, commitment, integrity and morality are family values offered by the No on 1 campaign. To be around any couple (gay, straight, or lesbian) who advocates for loving, life-long, married commitment, can only enhance my life, my 20-year marriage, and our daughters’ lives.

It is a privilege for me and my family to know other couples (gay, straight, or lesbian) who are committed to married life and who raise their children with integrity, love and compassion. I encourage all Mainers to have a tender heart toward gay and lesbian neighbors.

The bottom line is: No on 1 is advocating for committed marriages as a means to express the depth of loving relationships, and that is a beautiful and worthy aspiration for all human beings.

As Mainers, let’s take the high road. Blessings come in abundance to those who choose love over fear.

Pamella Starbird Beliveau is a graduate student at Boston College School of Theology and Ministry, a Catholic, lector, and Eucharistic minister at Prince of Peace Parish. She is a spokesperson for Maine Catholics for Marriage Equality. She lives in Lewiston with her husband and their two daughters.

Bishop Lane blogged about speaking at the press conference that the Religious Coalition for the Freedom to Marry in Maine held opposing question 1.  You can read his blog post here and his statement here.

Frank O’Hara wrote this open letter to the Bishop regarding the video that was played in Parishes over the weekend.

Local Catholics are writing into papers across the state letting their friends and neighbors know that they will be voting No on Question 1.  Today, Toni Scucci, Lorrie Ferrari and Nancy Tremblay had their letters published in their local papers.

Today Catholics for Marriage Equality released this statement regarding the Bishop’s DVD that was shown in Parishes around the state.